The Succession Plan: Your Company's Favorite Fairy Tale๐ง♂️๐
Good morning, readers!๐
How are you doing today?
Let's talk about the succession plan.
That glossy PowerPoint slide with a neat org chart, boxes with names, dotted lines full of hope, and a title like "Talent Pipeline 2027."๐
Every company has one. Almost none of them work.
Yet HR keeps polishing this document like it's the Shroud of Turin๐ฏ️, when really it's more like a grocery list you wrote while hungry: ambitious, unrealistic, abandoned the second reality walks through the door.๐ช
Somewhere in a shared drive, buried in a folder called "Strategic_2025_FINAL_v3_ACTUAL_FINAL,"๐lives a document saying Marco from Finance will be ready to become CFO "within 18-24 months, pending development."
Marco has no idea this document exists.
Marco is currently trying to expense a client dinner without HR asking questions.๐งพ
Marco is not thinking about becoming CFO. Marco is thinking about lunch.๐ฅช
That's the beautiful absurdity of succession planning: built in the abstract, by people in a room, about people who never agreed to want that future.๐
Then there's the "HiPo" tag⭐slapped on like a gold star sticker from kindergarten, except instead of a sticker you get more meetings and vague promises about "visibility with leadership."
Being called High Potential is like being told your soup "has potential"๐ฒa compliment, technically, but you're still eating lukewarm soup.
Most succession plans exist to satisfy an audit, not to develop anyone.
It's corporate theatre.๐ญ
The board wants a slide, the slide gets made, everyone claps๐, and the actual successor turns out to be whoever survived the reorg and didn't quit.
The real test comes when someone important quits on a Friday.
Not a graceful eighteen-month transition just gone, LinkedIn post already drafted, "excited for what's next."✨๐ช
Watch the plan evaporate.๐จ
The "ready now" successor is suddenly not ready.
An "interim" appointment drags on for fourteen months.
Someone external gets parachuted in๐ชbecause, plot twist, nobody internal was actually being developed; they were just being talked about in a slide.
Why does it keep failing?๐ช
It's built top-down, without ever asking people what they actually want; some don't want your job, and that's fine๐ ♀️.
"Stretch assignments" are usually just extra work wearing a bow๐.
Plans get reviewed once a year like a gym membership๐️♂️, full of intention in January, forgotten by March.
And somehow, nobody tells the successor they're the successor๐ค; they find out after accepting a job elsewhere.
Here's the real point, sarcasm aside: a succession plan only works as a living conversation, not a static document.๐ฃ️
Name successors and tell them.
Invest in real development: actual projects, actual mentorship, actual budget, not "coaching TBD."
Revisit it quarterly, not annually๐, because ambitions and job markets move faster than your calibration calendar.
And accept that not everyone wants a ladder; some want mastery๐ช๐ฏ, and a good plan makes room for both.
Charts don't retain talent. Conversations do.๐ฌ
So next time someone proudly presents the "Talent Pipeline 2027" slide, ask one question: does the person in that box know they're in it?๐
If the answer is no, you don't have a succession plan.
You have a beautifully formatted guess.๐คท♂️
Have a look at my portfolio: https://www.careerformulas.com/my-services
https://amzn.to/4wvyldv / https://amzn.to/4wy2okP
https://amzn.to/4pPVjtl / https://amzn.to/4fv8T1H
https://amzn.to/4h5F0WU / https://amzn.to/4bk3Oqv
https://amzn.to/4fIEWKa / https://amzn.to/4hEZuG7
https://amzn.to/4vXQTBY / https://amzn.to/4yNjXyJ
#SuccessionPlanning #HRTalk #TalentDevelopment #LeadershipPipeline #FutureOfWork



Comments